Working with multiple n8n instances over MCP
When the n8n_instances tool is available, the user has multi-instance mode on: one MCP
connection can reach several n8n instances (e.g. prod, staging, or one per client/team).
Every other n8n tool (n8n_get_workflow, n8n_list_workflows, n8n_update_partial_workflow,
n8n_manage_datatable, n8n_manage_credentials, n8n_executions, n8n_test_workflow, …) runs
against whichever instance this session is currently targeting. There is no per-call instance
argument: you change the target only by switching. Target the wrong instance and a read returns the
wrong data and a write lands in the wrong place — usually with no error (the one exception is an
ambiguous credential write, which fails closed; see below). So target deliberately.
If the n8n_instances tool is not present, the account is single-instance: ignore this skill
and use the n8n tools directly.
Golden rules
Six rules. Each prevents a class of silent misroute.
- Discover first. Call
n8n_instances({mode:"list"})before acting so you know the instance names and which one iscurrent. - Switch by name to your target before doing work on a non-default instance:
n8n_instances({mode:"switch", name:"<instance name>"}). The match is case-insensitive. - Switch in its own turn. Never put a
switchand a dependent operation in the same parallel tool-call batch. Calls in one batch have no guaranteed order, so the dependent call can be resolved against the previous instance before the switch's session state is visible. Switch, let it return, then operate. - Verify before high-stakes ops. Immediately before creating/updating/deleting credentials
(and before destructive workflow edits), confirm
currentis the instance you intend — primary check isn8n_instances({mode:"list"}). The system fail-closes only the ambiguous credential case (rule 6); an explicit switch to the wrong instance still writes there silently, so this check is on you. - An unexpected
NOT_FOUNDis almost always a wrong-instance misroute, not a deletion. Don't recreate the object. Re-check the current instance and retry (see Recovery). - On
INSTANCE_AMBIGUOUS, switch on this session, then retry. The system is refusing to write a secret because this session never picked a target itself. Comply — runswitchhere to confirm the instance, then retry the write. Don't work around it or retry blindly.
Core workflow
1. n8n_instances({mode:"list"}) # see available[] + current + default
2. n8n_instances({mode:"switch", name:"prod"}) # bind THIS session to "prod"
→ returns { previous, current }; confirm current.name == "prod"
3. (do your work) n8n_list_workflows / n8n_get_workflow / n8n_manage_datatable / ...
4. Before a credential write or a delete:
n8n_instances({mode:"list"}) → re-confirm current, THEN n8n_manage_credentials({action:"create", ...})
To move to another instance, just switch again. The whole session follows the switch.
The n8n_instances tool
Two modes (mode is required and enum-validated):
{mode:"list"}→{ current, default, available }, no side effects.currentanddefaultare each one instance{ id, name, url, isDefault }(ornull).availableis every instance, each with an extraisCurrentboolean. Match byname; never hard-codeid.
{mode:"switch", name:"<name>"}→{ previous, current }, and binds this session to the named instance.nameis case-insensitive.
Error envelope (from the n8n_instances tool)
Every error returns { error: "<CODE>", message, … }. The ones you'll actually hit:
| Code | When | What to do |
|---|---|---|
UNKNOWN_INSTANCE | name matches no instance | Pick a name from the available list in the error payload and retry. |
NAME_REQUIRED | switch with no name | Re-call with a name (the error lists the valid ones in available). |
MULTI_INSTANCE_DISABLED | multi-instance mode is off | There's nothing to switch; use the n8n tools directly. The user can enable it at the n8n-mcp dashboard. |
NO_SESSION | the request has neither an MCP session id nor a credential id | A selection has nowhere to land. Reconnect / initialize a session, then switch. |
UNKNOWN_MODE | mode wasn't list/switch | Use list or switch. |
INVALID_CONTEXT | server-side metadata missing | A server bug, not your input — report it. |
Instance names can never be
default,current,list, orswitch(reserved), so you'll never see an instance literally named after a mode or field.
INSTANCE_AMBIGUOUS (from the credential-write path, not the tool)
A separate, higher-stakes error. It is not returned by n8n_instances — it's returned by the
server when you call n8n_manage_credentials to create/update/delete a credential and the target
instance is ambiguous: this session never switched on its own but inherited a switch made elsewhere
(a fan-out / reconnect), pointing at a non-default instance. Rather than risk writing a secret to
the wrong instance, the server blocks the write (it never reaches n8n, no quota is charged) and
returns:
{
"error": "INSTANCE_AMBIGUOUS",
"message": "… the session issuing this request never switched there itself … Re-run n8n_instances({mode:\"switch\", name:\"…\"}) on this session to confirm the target …",
"lastSelected": { "id": "…", "name": "…" },
"default": { "id": "…", "name": "…" }
}
Fix: decide which instance you actually want (lastSelected is the inherited switch, default
is the account default), run n8n_instances({mode:"switch", name:"…"}) on this session, then
retry the write. See rule 6.
How targeting behaves (mental model)
- A
switchbinds this session to the chosen instance. The binding persists for the rest of the session and survives reconnects, idle, and backend deploys (~24h, the MCP session lifetime) — you should not need to re-switch before every call. - Other sessions / terminals are independent: switching here does not move them.
- One session targets one instance at a time. There is no per-call instance argument; you
change the target only via
switch. - Reads and non-credential writes route to the currently-selected instance, silently — a
misroute produces wrong data or a
NOT_FOUND, not an error. - Credential writes are the one guarded case. They route the same way, except the server
fail-closes the ambiguous state (a session that never switched, recovered onto a non-default
instance) with
INSTANCE_AMBIGUOUS. This is a safety net, not a substitute for rule 4: an explicit switch to the wrong instance still writes there. - If your selected instance is deleted (the user removes it mid-session), the next call silently falls back to your default instance — no error. So default's data appearing where you expected another instance's can look like "my data vanished." Re-list to see where you are.
Recovery playbook
| Symptom | What it usually means | Do this |
|---|---|---|
INSTANCE_AMBIGUOUS on a credential create/update/delete | This session never switched itself; the system won't guess which instance to write the secret to | Run n8n_instances({mode:"switch", name:"<target>"}) on this session (the error names lastSelected and default — pick the one you want), then retry the write. Never retry blindly. |
NOT_FOUND for a workflow/datatable/credential you know exists | You're pointed at the wrong instance — not that it was deleted | n8n_instances({mode:"list"}) → check current. If it's not your target, switch and retry. Do not recreate the object. |
| A read returns empty or unfamiliar data | Wrong-instance read, or a silent fallback to default after your instance was deleted | n8n_instances({mode:"list"}), confirm current, switch if needed, re-read before drawing conclusions. |
UNKNOWN_INSTANCE on switch | The name is wrong (typo, or you guessed) | Read the available names in the error and switch to one of those. Names are case-insensitive. |
n8n_health_check reports an instanceName you didn't expect | This session is on a different instance than you think | switch to the intended instance, then proceed. |
| Repeated misroutes within one turn | You batched a switch with dependent work | Split them: switch alone, await the result, then operate one logical step at a time. |
After any recovery switch, sanity-check with n8n_instances({mode:"list"}) (read current) as the
primary signal. n8n_health_check also returns the resolved instance under details.instanceName,
but it can be absent on some paths (legacy/chat), so treat it as a secondary confirmation.
Credential operations (highest stakes)
Credentials hold live secrets, and a misrouted credential write puts a secret on the wrong
instance. The server protects the ambiguous case automatically — if this session never picked
a target and inherited a switch to a non-default instance, the write fails closed with
INSTANCE_AMBIGUOUS (rule 6) and never reaches n8n. But that net is narrow: a credential write on a
session that did switch goes through to whatever instance it switched to, with no second
guess. So:
- Verify
currentimmediately beforen8n_manage_credentialscreate/update/delete — calln8n_instances({mode:"list"})in the same short sequence, not 10 steps earlier where a later switch could have moved you. - On
INSTANCE_AMBIGUOUS, switch on this session to confirm the target, then retry — don't work around it. - Credential reads (
action:"list"/"get"/"getSchema") are not gated and don't write a secret, but a read off the wrong instance returns the wrong schema or list — so still verifycurrentif the result looks wrong. - For the
n8n_manage_credentialstool itself (CRUD shapes,getSchemadiscovery, never inlining secrets into text fields), seen8n-mcp-tools-expert.
Common multi-instance task: copy something between instances
To recreate a credential or workflow from instance A on instance B:
1. switch → A; read the source (n8n_manage_credentials get / n8n_get_workflow)
2. switch → B (its own call — never batched with the create below)
3. n8n_instances({mode:"list"}) → confirm current == B
4. create on B (n8n_manage_credentials create / n8n_create_workflow)
Do each instance's steps in its own turn; never overlap switch → B with the create-on-B call
(rule 3), and switch explicitly on this session before the credential write so it isn't ambiguous
(rules 4 and 6).
Quick reference
- See instances + where you are:
n8n_instances({mode:"list"})→{ current, default, available } - Change target:
n8n_instances({mode:"switch", name:"<name>"})— its own turn, then operate - Confirm target:
currentfromlist(primary);details.instanceNamefromn8n_health_check(secondary, may be absent) UNKNOWN_INSTANCE→ switch to a name from the error'savailablelist, then retryINSTANCE_AMBIGUOUS(credential write) →switchon this session to confirm the target, then retry- Unexpected
NOT_FOUND→ verify the instance, switch, retry; do not recreate - Before credential writes → re-
list, confirmcurrent, then write (the fail-close only covers the ambiguous case)
Integration with other skills
- n8n-mcp-tools-expert — owns
n8n_manage_credentials(CRUD +getSchema) and the rule that secrets go through the credential system, never text fields. This skill adds the "which instance?" layer on top. - using-n8n-mcp-skills — the router; consult it for which skill owns a given build step.