Grok Build Orchestration
When to Use
- Use when delegating a well-specified implementation task to xAI's Grok Build CLI running headlessly
- Use when executing a Markdown implementation plan task-by-task with a diff review after each task
- Use when the user says "use grok", "grok build", "have grok implement", or "send to grok"
The coding assistant is the orchestrator: it plans, writes self-contained task specs,
dispatches them to Grok Build headlessly, reviews every diff, and owns the final result.
Grok is the fast, cheap executor. Full CLI details and verified behaviors: references/cli.md.
Safety Gate
Before every dispatch, show the user the exact task specification that will be sent to xAI,
the target worktree, and the permission mode. Obtain explicit approval to disclose that text
and to let Grok edit the scoped worktree. Never include secrets, proprietary source, customer
data, or credentials in a task specification. Do not run grok update, --always-approve,
or a destructive recovery command without separate, explicit approval.
When to delegate vs keep with the orchestrator
| Delegate to Grok | Keep with the orchestrator |
|---|---|
| Plan tasks with clear acceptance criteria | Ambiguous requirements, architecture decisions |
| Boilerplate, scaffolding, CRUD | Deep cross-file debugging |
| Mechanical refactors | Security-sensitive code |
| Test writing from clear specs | Anything touching production infrastructure |
| UI components from mockups/specs | Tasks where writing the spec ≈ doing the work |
When in doubt, keep it with the orchestrator.
Session preflight (once, before the first dispatch)
grok update --check --json— ifupdateAvailableis true, tell the user. Rungrok updateonly after explicit approval, then confirm withgrok --version.grok models— if it errors or reports logged out, STOP and ask the user to rungrok login.
Per-task loop (sequential — the default)
-
Spec. Write a self-contained task file (template below) to a temp directory OUTSIDE the target repo — the harness scratchpad if one is available, else the OS temp dir. Never write it inside the target repo. Grok has zero conversation context: no one-liner prompts, ever.
- POSIX:
mkdir -p "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/grok-specs", then writetask.mdthere. - Windows (PowerShell):
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force "$env:TEMP\grok-specs", then writetask.mdthere.
- POSIX:
-
Clean state. No uncommitted source changes — commit or stash first, so the post-run diff is exactly Grok's work. Ignore build artifacts (
__pycache__,dist/, etc.); if they show ingit status, they're usually just un-gitignored, not your concern. Never dispatch on a dirty source tree. -
Dispatch.
POSIX:
grok --prompt-file <task-file> \ --output-format json \ --always-approve \ --max-turns 30 \ --cwd <repo>Windows (PowerShell) — backtick line-continuation:
grok --prompt-file <task-file> ` --output-format json ` --always-approve ` --max-turns 30 ` --cwd <repo>Parse the JSON output and save
sessionId. (--always-approveis required for headless runs —--permission-mode acceptEditssilently cancels edits with no interactive approver. Use it only after the user explicitly approves Grok editing this exact scoped worktree. Seereferences/cli.md.) For a high-stakes task, add--checkso Grok self-verifies before you review; skip it otherwise (it ~doubles latency). -
Review gate — non-negotiable.
- Read the diff yourself (
git diff -- <files from the spec>to skip artifact noise): does it do the task, only the task, and match repo conventions? - Run the acceptance commands from the spec.
- Pass → commit with a clear message following the repo's convention → next task.
- Fail → ask the user before a fix-up or any reset. Never run
git checkout -- .orgit clean -fdautomatically; preserve the diff for review and use a non-destructive recovery plan unless the user explicitly authorizes otherwise.
- Read the diff yourself (
Task spec template
# Task: <one-line title>
## Context
- Repo: <path> — <one line on what the project is>
- Conventions: <test runner, formatter, a good example file to imitate>
## Files
- Modify: <path>
- Create: <path>
## Task
<precise description of the change>
## Constraints
- Do not modify any files other than those listed above.
- <other constraints>
## Acceptance criteria
- `<exact command>` <expected result>
Executing a Markdown implementation plan
- One plan task per dispatch, in order.
- Check off the plan's task checkboxes (
- [ ]→- [x]) as each task lands and passes the review gate. - If the plan explicitly marks tasks as independent, see Parallel dispatch below; otherwise stay sequential.
Parallel dispatch (opt-in exception, not the default)
Only when a plan explicitly marks tasks independent: dispatch each with
--worktree=<task-slug>, run concurrently, then review and merge one worktree at a
time through the same review gate. Merge conflicts usually eat the savings — prefer
sequential.
Failure handling
| Failure | Action |
|---|---|
stopReason: "Cancelled", empty text, no diff | Missing --always-approve — retry with it |
| CLI error / timeout | Retry once; then do the task yourself and note the fallback |
| Auth expired | Stop; ask the user to run grok login |
| 2 fix-up rounds exhausted | Preserve the diff, ask the user for a recovery decision, then finish the task manually if authorized |
| Dirty tree at dispatch | Refuse; commit/stash first |
Limitations
- Grok receives the approved task specification; it is a third-party service and should not receive secrets, proprietary material, personal data, or customer data.
--always-approveallows edits without an interactive approval prompt. It must be limited to a clean, explicitly approved worktree and never substitutes for the orchestrator's review.- Model output can be incorrect, insecure, incomplete, or out of scope. Review the diff and run the acceptance checks before accepting any change.
- This skill does not authorize installations, updates, commits, pushes, deployments, or destructive cleanup.
Models
Default grok-4.5. Add -m grok-composer-2.5-fast only for trivial mechanical tasks.